High Court orders state to explain failure to establish civil cemetery for Jerusalem residents
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- The High Court of Justice has ordered the state to explain its failure to establish a state-funded civil cemetery for Jerusalem residents, three decades after a civil burial law was enacted.
- The court issued a conditional order directing relevant ministries and the Jerusalem Jewish Burial Council to justify their inaction on establishing the cemetery, allocating a budget, and granting necessary licenses.
- Petitioners argue that the lack of a civil cemetery in Jerusalem effectively denies non-Orthodox groups the right to alternative burial, forcing them to seek options outside the capital or forgo them entirely.
For thirty years, Israeli law has recognized the right to civil burial, yet residents of Jerusalem and its surrounding areas are still without a state-funded civil cemetery. This glaring discrepancy has led the High Court of Justice to intervene, ordering the state to explain its decades-long failure to implement this fundamental right. The court's conditional order, directed at the Religious Services Ministry, Finance Ministry, and the Jerusalem Jewish Burial Council, signals a serious judicial challenge to the status quo.
The petitioners, including Menucha Nechona Jerusalem, the Reform movement, Hiddush, and the Masorti movement, argue that the absence of a civil cemetery in the capital effectively obstructs access to non-Orthodox burial options. This forces families who do not wish for an Orthodox religious burial to either travel outside Jerusalem or abandon the option altogether. The court's skepticism, evident during the hearing, highlights the perceived lack of genuine effort by the state to fulfill its legal obligations.
the law was โvery clearโ and left no real room for discretion on the question of providing civil burial, adding that the provision imposed a duty - not a matter of choice - and warned that absent โgood news,โ the court would issue a conditional order.
Justices Alex Stein and Khaled Kabub pressed state representatives on the clear legislative mandate and the financial aspects, questioning the NIS 15 million cost estimate and the structural barriers that seem to favor established religious burial companies. The core issue remains that after 30 years, Jerusalem residents seeking a civil burial are still denied this option. The state's preliminary response suggests a more complex picture, but the court's action indicates that these explanations must be substantial to justify the continued inaction.
This case underscores a persistent tension in Israel between religious pluralism and the dominance of Orthodox Judaism in state-sanctioned religious affairs. The struggle for a civil cemetery in Jerusalem is not just about burial practices; it is about ensuring that all citizens, regardless of their religious observance, have their rights and choices respected within the public sphere. The High Court's intervention is a critical step towards potentially rectifying this long-standing inequity.
After 30 years, Jerusalem residents who want a civil burial still do not have it.
Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.