In Israel, a locked-down democracy

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is orchestrating internal changes within his Likud party, a move critics describe as an attempt to consolidate power ahead of crucial legislative elections. The party's electoral committee has, for the first time, reserved nine seats for candidates personally selected by Netanyahu. Furthermore, internal regulations have been altered to facilitate the election of Almog Cohen, a far-right politician previously aligned with the Jewish Power party, into the Likud ranks. This strategy appears designed to sideline critical voices within the party, such as former Jerusalem mayor Nir Barkat.

This internal maneuvering comes as the Likud faces a potentially weakened position. Currently holding 32 seats in the 120-member parliament, projections suggest the party might secure only 22 to 24 seats in the October elections. Netanyahu's coalition also appears less robust than that of former military chief Gadi Eisenkot, with 50 seats compared to Eisenkot's 58. The Likud is reportedly employing various tactics, including threatening legal action against an American organization aiming to enable the estimated 500,000 Israeli expatriates to vote, as Israel currently prohibits remote voting.

The upcoming October election is particularly significant as it will be the first since the country entered its longest and most extensive war. Deep societal divisions are evident, with President Isaac Herzog warning against political violence and interference, fears shared by 72% of Jewish Israelis and nearly 60% of Arab Israelis. The outcome hinges on securing at least 61 seats, making every vote critical, including those of Arab citizens who constitute 21% of the population and are projected to hold 10 to 12 seats crucial for any opposition bloc seeking to govern.

The article also points to another significant barrier: the exclusion of Arab citizens, who are described not as mere bystanders or victims but as vital actors. The "lockdown" on Arab parties and their potential influence is presented as a further impediment to Israel's democratic future. The author emphasizes the need to recognize these citizens' role, suggesting that their full participation is essential for the nation's democratic health.