Indonesian Court Upholds Direct Regional Elections, Ending Debate
Translated from Indonesian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The Indonesian Constitutional Court has ruled that regional head elections will continue to be directly elected by the people.
- This decision ends the debate over whether elections should be held by the regional parliament.
- Lawmakers are now urged to focus on improving the quality of direct elections and related laws.
Indonesia's Constitutional Court has definitively settled the debate surrounding the regional head election system, affirming that direct elections by the people will continue. The court's ruling on Case Number 195/PUU-XXIV/2026, delivered on Monday, June 29, upholds the mechanism for regional heads to be chosen directly by citizens. Eka Widodo, a member of Commission II of the House of Representatives, stated that the court's final and binding decision must be respected by all state administrators. He urged all parties to cease discussions about returning the election mechanism to the regional parliament, a proposal that had gained some traction. Instead, Widodo called for a focus on enhancing the quality of direct elections to ensure the emergence of regional leaders who are integrous, competent, and prioritize public interests. "The most important thing is no longer debating how to choose regional heads, but ensuring clean regional governance, quality public services, and development that is increasingly felt by the community," he said in a written statement on Wednesday, July 1, 2026. While respecting the court's decision, Widodo acknowledged that the idea of reviving elections through the regional parliament was not inherently anti-democratic. He suggested it stemmed from constitutional and academic studies, as well as empirical experiences with issues arising from direct elections, such as high political costs, rampant money politics, societal polarization, and corruption cases involving regional heads. Widodo also pushed for the acceleration of revisions to the Election Law and Regional Head Election Law, aiming to reduce political costs, strengthen political party cadre systems, increase campaign finance transparency, combat money politics, and refine the merit-based recruitment of regional head candidates. Meanwhile, Bahtra Banong, Deputy Chairman of Commission II of the House of Representatives, also expressed respect for the Constitutional Court's decision. However, he indicated that Commission II would not immediately discuss revisions to the Regional Head Election Law, as their current focus is on amending the General Election Law. "We have not yet discussed the Draft Law on Regional Head Elections. However, of course, we respect and appreciate what the Constitutional Court has decided," Banong stated at the Parliament Complex in Jakarta on Wednesday, July 1, 2026. He reiterated that the court's ruling confirms that the people hold sovereignty in local elections.
Originally published by Tempo in Indonesian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.