Influencer Lin Jin Apologizes After Private Part Hair Removal Video Sparks Controversy
Translated from Chinese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Taiwanese influencer Lin Jin faced criticism for a video showing his private part hair removal on Threads.
- Some netizens expressed discomfort and questioned the appropriateness of the content.
- Lin Jin apologized for causing discomfort and explained his intention was to address audience curiosity.
Taiwanese influencer Lin Jin has issued an apology after a video of his private part hair removal sparked controversy on social media. The clip, shared on Threads, drew sharp reactions from some netizens who deemed the content inappropriate and overly intimate for public viewing.
Sorry for causing trouble, if you don't want to see it, you can block me!
Comments ranged from questioning the necessity of such a video to expressing discomfort, with one user asking, "Is this something that can be seen?" Another suggested that if the content was part of a sponsored post, hair removal from the legs or underarms would have been more suitable.
I've tried underarm and leg hair removal, and many people asked about private part hair removal, so I thought I'd film it directly. Sorry to make your eyes uncomfortable.
Responding to the backlash, Lin Jin explained that he had previously tried hair removal videos for his underarms and legs. He stated that many followers had inquired about private part hair removal, prompting him to create the video to address their curiosity directly. He apologized for any discomfort caused and urged viewers to block his content if they did not wish to see it. Lin Jin also asked the public not to view the practice of private part hair removal through a biased lens, emphasizing that useful products should not be a source of shame.
I really feel uncomfortable, and there was no spoiler warning.
Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.