DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel /Conflict & Security

Iran War: Why Did Trump Stop Fighting When Victory Was Near, Asks Analyst Keane

From Jerusalem Post · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

Opinion Sources not specified Context piece
  • Retired U.S. Army General Jack Keane stated that the U.S. and Israel were close to achieving their objectives in the war against Iran after 38 days.
  • Keane believes an additional two weeks of fighting would have led to Iran's collapse and regime change.
  • The article questions why President Trump declared a ceasefire on April 7, leaving the mission incomplete, despite the apparent military success.

Retired U.S. Army General Jack Keane asserted that the U.S. and Israel were on the verge of defeating Iran after 38 days of conflict, having achieved key objectives like dismantling Iran's military capabilities and industrial base. Keane, a respected analyst, stated on "Life, Liberty and Levin" that only two more weeks of fighting were needed to secure regime change.

All that was needed were another two weeks to complete the objectives, which would have placed Iran on a path to regime change

โ€” Jack KeaneGeneral Jack Keane's assessment of the remaining military objectives in the war against Iran.

However, the war, which began on February 28, 2026, concluded with a ceasefire on April 7, leaving the mission incomplete. This decision has led to ongoing negotiations over the Strait of Hormuz, which have so far resulted in an impasse. Iran has since broken a Memorandum of Understanding agreement, prompting economic pressure.

Since then, there has been a protracted period of time during which negotiations have taken place over the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, due to there being an impasse.

โ€” Cookie Schwaeber-IssaDescribing the post-ceasefire diplomatic situation.

Keane expressed skepticism that financial suffering alone will compel Iran to surrender, given its history of breaking deals. He argued that rewarding Iran with money would only allow it to rebuild and postpone the inevitable, leaving future administrations to address the issue. Keane concluded that a way must be found to stop the Iranian regime.

With their belief that โ€œtime is on their side,โ€ few are convinced that the dire financial suffering will be enough to get them to cry โ€œuncle.โ€

โ€” Cookie Schwaeber-IssaCommenting on the effectiveness of economic pressure against Iran.

The article highlights a perceived mystery: the decision to declare a ceasefire when the Iranian regime was reportedly close to collapse. It questions who made this call, especially given the military assessments that victory was within reach.

Keane deduced that based on Iranโ€™s track record of breaking deals, they will not comply with any deal.

โ€” Cookie Schwaeber-IssaReporting Keane's view on Iran's reliability in agreements.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.