Irish Justice Minister to Review New Fees for Criminal Solicitors Amid Protest
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Criminal defense solicitors in Ireland have stopped working to protest proposed changes to their payment structure.
- The changes, effective July 1, replace per-appearance fees with a set fee of โฌ455, which lawyers argue is a 20% cut.
- The Justice Minister is considering increasing the set fee amid ongoing discussions with the Department of Public Expenditure.
Ireland's legal system faces significant disruption as criminal defense solicitors have withdrawn their services, protesting a new payment system for legal aid work. The protest has led to the adjournment of thousands of District Court cases nationwide.
I'm in discussions with the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform and the Minister [for Public Expenditure] Jack Chambers. I can't make decisions like this on my own. I very much recognise and acknowledge the important role played by [the] legal profession. I will be looking to see whether I can increase the โฌ455 I have proposed initially.
Starting July 1, the current system of paying solicitors for each court appearance, which includes an initial fee of โฌ239.38 and โฌ59.86 for subsequent hearings, will be replaced by a flat fee of โฌ455. Solicitors argue this change effectively amounts to a 20% pay cut, making criminal legal aid practice financially unsustainable for many. The Law Society, representing solicitors, has expressed strong opposition, calling the proposal "deeply alarming" and based on "anecdote and hearsay" rather than rigorous evidence.
I'm trying get it up from โฌ455.
Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan acknowledged the solicitors' concerns and stated he is in discussions with the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform to explore increasing the proposed โฌ455 fee. "I'm trying get it up from โฌ455," he told RTร's This Week program, emphasizing that he cannot make such decisions unilaterally. He also cited "inefficiencies and abuses of the current system" as reasons for the need for change.
It was 'hard to overstate' the level of anger among solicitors about the proposals. She said it was 'deeply alarming' that the Government was proposing a 20% cut to criminal legal aid while imposing a model which she said had 'demonstrably failed' in the family law area.
Rosemary Loftus, President of the Law Society, criticized the government's approach, stating it was an insult to the legal profession and the public. She warned that the new proposal could lead to an exodus from the criminal legal aid scheme, potentially impacting access to justice. The Law Society insists that any reform should be grounded in systematic evidence and rigorous analysis, not on anecdotal information.
She said the Government was implementing this proposal on the basis of anecdote and hearsay which she said was an insult to the legal profession and the public. She said it should be grounded in rigorous analysis and systematic evidence.
Originally published by RTร News in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.