DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Conflict & Security

Joint drills crucial for wartime control transfer, but timeline disagreements linger

From Hankyoreh · () Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Ongoing story
  • South Korea and the U.S. are set to conduct the 'Ulchi Freedom Shield' joint military exercise starting July 17.
  • A key objective is to verify the Full Operational Capability (FOC) of the Future Combined Command, a crucial step for transferring wartime operational control (์ „์ž‘๊ถŒ) back to South Korea.
  • Disagreements persist between Seoul and Washington regarding the timeline for this transfer, with South Korea aiming for an earlier date than the U.S. military's projected 2029.

South Korea and the United States are preparing for the 'Ulchi Freedom Shield' (UFS) joint military exercise, scheduled to begin on July 17 and last for about ten days. This year's exercise holds particular significance as it includes the verification of the Full Operational Capability (FOC) for the Future Combined Command, a prerequisite for the transfer of wartime operational control (์ „์ž‘๊ถŒ) from the U.S. to South Korea.

Both the South Korean Joint Chiefs of Staff and the U.S.-ROK Combined Forces Command announced the exercise schedule, emphasizing its role in "continuously promoting preparations for the conditions-based transfer of wartime operational control as agreed upon by South Korea and the U.S." The two nations had previously agreed in November to pursue the FOC verification of the Future Combined Command in 2026. Successful completion of this year's exercise is vital for the defense ministers of both countries to approve the verification results and propose a target year for the transfer at the Security Consultative Meeting (SCM) in the fall.

However, differences in the envisioned timeline for the transfer of operational control remain. U.S. Forces Korea Commander Gen. Paul LaCamera suggested a timeline of "the first quarter of 2029," after the end of a potential second term for former President Donald Trump, during testimony before the U.S. Congress in April. In contrast, the South Korean government, with President Lee Jae-myung expressing confidence that "there would be no problem even if operational control is recovered tomorrow," seeks to expedite the process as much as possible.

South Korean Defense Minister Shin Won-sik reiterated his commitment during a recent briefing, stating his intention to "complete the roadmap for recovering wartime operational control this year and pursue the decision on the recovery timeline at the ROK-U.S. SCM (in the fall)."

Despite South Korea's aspirations, the article cautions that critical decisions impacting Korean Peninsula security have often been dictated by U.S. unilateral judgment rather than Seoul's hopes. U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, while acknowledging South Korea's desire to regain control, stressed the need to find a "balanced point where the military operational plans and responsibilities that the U.S. military has carried out for decades are respected." The article concludes that achieving the transfer goal hinges on understanding this sentiment and presenting a solution that satisfies the U.S., warning that rushing without thorough preparation could lead to setbacks.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.