DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel /Crime & Justice

Judge asked to block Trump's planned UFC event at White House

From Jerusalem Post · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources In the courts
  • Two Washington-area residents filed a lawsuit seeking to block President Trump's planned UFC event at the White House.
  • The plaintiffs argue the event violates federal regulations and improperly uses public monuments for private purposes.
  • The White House dismissed the lawsuit as baseless, comparing the event to other White House activities.

A legal challenge has emerged against President Donald Trump's plan to host an Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) event on the White House's South Lawn. Two local residents are seeking an emergency court order to halt the event, citing violations of federal regulations and the improper use of public spaces.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court, specifically targets the authorization of the event, dubbed "UFC Freedom 250," by the National Park Service and Interior Department. Plaintiffs argue that federal monuments and public spaces should not be used for private gain. The event is scheduled for June 14, coinciding with Trump's 80th birthday, and is expected to feature fights within a large octagon cage, with weigh-ins planned at the Lincoln Memorial.

This nation's public monuments should not be loaned out for private exploitation.

โ€” PlaintiffsThe plaintiffs stated their argument in their court filing, asserting that federal monuments should not be used for private purposes.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs are asking US District Judge Amit Mehta to issue a temporary restraining order to prevent the event and the construction of a large arena structure, known as "the Claw," on the South Lawn. They contend that such a large-scale construction project requires congressional authorization and violates rules against sporting events on federal grounds.

The White House has strongly refuted the lawsuit, labeling it an "obstructionist, baseless, and dilatory lawsuit." An administration statement defended the event, asserting its comparability to other activities previously hosted on White House grounds and nearby federal sites. This legal battle adds to a series of challenges Trump faces regarding construction projects in Washington.

obstructionist, baseless, and dilatory lawsuit.

โ€” White HouseThe White House dismissed the lawsuit, characterizing it with these terms in a statement.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.