Judge deems Trump's lawsuit against US tax authority 'improper'

A U.S. federal judge has declared Donald Trump's lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) "improper," striking down an agreement that aimed to protect the former president's family and businesses from tax audits. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams of Florida ruled against the deal, which had initially included a fund of nearly $1.8 billion in public resources intended to compensate Trump allies for alleged "persecution."

“

the plaintiffs improperly used this lawsuit to justify concessions from the government: access to taxpayer funds and exemption from audits, which they achieved by exerting influence over the defendants.

Judge Williams concluded that "the plaintiffs improperly used this lawsuit to justify" concessions from the government, including access to taxpayer funds and exemption from audits. She stated that this was achieved "by exerting influence over the defendants," referring to the IRS. The court determined it was "an attempt to use the court to grant a certain legitimacy to an agreement designed to confer immunity upon individuals and entities affiliated with the president, and to allocate billions of dollars of U.S. taxpayers' money to repair grievances not defined in law."

The ruling invalidated the lawsuit and the extrajudicial agreement, which had been signed by interim Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump's former personal lawyer. The agreement stipulated that the IRS would be "permanently prohibited and barred" from pursuing actions against Trump and his family, and established the public fund for alleged "persecution" of the president's allies. Trump and his sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, had filed the suit earlier this year against the IRS over the leak of their tax returns to the media.

“

This constituted an attempt to use the court to grant a certain legitimacy to an agreement designed to confer immunity upon individuals and entities affiliated with the president, and to allocate billions of dollars of U.S. taxpayers' money to repair grievances not defined in law.

Williams rejected the lawsuit and the agreement, noting that Trump, as president, controls both the IRS and the Department of Justice. "These facts lead to the inexorable conclusion that the terms of the 'agreement,' the individuals who signed the 'agreement,' as well as the alleged beneficiaries thereof, demonstrate a common and unitary interest," she stated. Citing the "improper" conduct, the judge recommended sanctions against Trump's lawyers under Rule 11, which penalizes the abuse of court processes and aims to reimburse litigants for "abusive" or "unjustified" lawsuits. The court also called for the Florida and New York bar associations to review punishments for those involved and prohibited one attorney, Daniel Z. Epstein, from filing new motions in Florida courts for at least one year.

“

These facts lead to the inexorable conclusion that the terms of the 'agreement,' the individuals who signed the 'agreement,' as well as the alleged beneficiaries thereof, demonstrate a common and unitary interest.