DistantNews
Support us
Judge orders collection of 1.65 billion peso note amid campaign loan controversy
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Colombia /Crime & Justice

Judge orders collection of 1.65 billion peso note amid campaign loan controversy

From El Tiempo · () Spanish

Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources In the courts
  • A judge in Barranquilla has ordered the judicial collection of a promissory note worth 1.65 billion pesos.
  • The note is held against four individuals connected to the current departmental administration.
  • Businessman Anatolio Santos claims the money was a loan to support Eduardo Verano's 2023 gubernatorial campaign.

A judge in Barranquilla has ordered the judicial execution of a promissory note valued at 1.65 billion pesos (approximately $420,000 USD), reigniting controversy over the origin of campaign funds for Atlรกntico Governor Eduardo Verano. The ruling allows for the seizure of assets and the collection of interest.

The legal action stems from a lawsuit filed by businessman Anatolio Santos Olaya, former secretary of Economic Development for Atlรกntico, against Pedro Juan Lemus Navarro, Laureano Augusto Acuรฑa Dรญaz, ร“scar Javier Pantoja Palacio, and Carlos Alberto Barragรกn Martรญnez. Santos alleges that he provided the funds to support Verano's successful 2023 gubernatorial campaign.

The decision, made by the Twelfth Civil Circuit Court of Barranquilla on May 12, rejected the defendants' arguments against the debt's enforceability. The court determined that a valid obligation exists for the 1.65 billion pesos and mandated the continuation of debt execution, including the payment of default interest from October 25, 2024, until full payment. The ruling also permits the appraisal and auction of any seized assets to guarantee the debt's repayment.

Santos, a prominent businessman who previously served Governor Verano, claims he disbursed the funds in several installments prior to the elections, with the promissory note signed afterward to formalize the obligation. He has publicly stated that the money has not been repaid, nearly two years after the alleged loan was made. This judicial order represents a significant setback for the defendants, as the court found their objections to the collection of the debt invalid.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by El Tiempo in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.