Judge summarily rejects habeas corpus petition by police officers convicted of extortion
Translated from Spanish and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Paraguayan judge Alfredo Barrios rejected a preventive habeas corpus petition filed by officers Evelyng Nรบรฑez and Cemiรณn Arce, who have final convictions and outstanding arrest orders.
- Their lawyer argued that a pending constitutional challenge suspended the effects of their convictions and made the arrest order unlawful.
- Barrios said the Criminal Procedure Code requires authorities to enforce a final prison sentence and arrange the appearance or arrest of a convicted person who remains free.
A Paraguayan judge has rejected, at the outset, a preventive habeas corpus petition filed by two police officers convicted of extortion and subject to active arrest orders.
Judge Alfredo Barrios dismissed the petition from officer Evelyng Jazmรญn Nรบรฑez Gonzรกlez and noncommissioned officer Cemiรณn Arce Mendoza. Their lawyer, Zunilda Gonzรกlez, had challenged the national arrest order issued by the criminal enforcement court.
The officers have final four-year prison sentences in the case. Their defense argued that a constitutional challenge against the rulings upholding the convictions remained unresolved and automatically suspended the sentenceโs effects. The lawyer said the arrest order violated the officersโ liberty and due-process guarantees and caused irreparable harm.
The arrest order prima facie responds to that legal authority.
Barrios rejected that reasoning at this stage. He cited Article 493 of Paraguayโs Criminal Procedure Code, which requires authorities to take the measures needed to enforce a final conviction. When a person sentenced to prison remains free, the provision calls for the necessary steps to secure that personโs appearance or arrest.
The judge said the challenged order appeared, at first glance, to fall within that legal authority. He also referred to the Supreme Courtโs position that habeas corpus cannot serve as an appeal designed to replace ordinary legal remedies. The article ends while Barrios is explaining that reasoning.
Habeas corpus does not constitute an appellate remedy intended to replace ordinary appeals.
Originally published by ABC Color in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.