Judges' association praises Supreme Court decision on allowances

The Federal Judges Association (Ajufe) has lauded the Supreme Court's recent decision to reinstate certain bonuses and allowances for the judiciary, often referred to as "penduricalhos." The association asserts that these payments are justified by the essential services judges provide to the country.

This development comes after the Supreme Court initially blocked these payments in March. The court has now formed a majority in favor of allowing the reinstatement of these additional payments for judges, prosecutors, and attorneys. The authorization covers retroactive payments and other benefits, including seniority bonuses.

Ajufe President Ana Lya Ferraz stated that the ruling places the debate on technical grounds. She emphasized the judiciary's commitment to transparency, independence, and constitutional adherence. While advocating against irregular funds, the association points out that public discourse often overlooks specific instances where payments stem from actual work performed, such as unused vacation days due to service needs or court duty shifts.

The Supreme Court upheld the principle that indemnity payments should not exceed 35% of the constitutional ceiling, which is currently set at R$46,366.19. However, ministers have permitted certain payments, like those for judicial custody and court duty, to be excluded from this limit.

“

A transparência, a independência do Poder Judiciário e o respeito à Constituição são compromissos da magistratura