DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia /Crime & Justice

Judicial Commission Receives Report on Ethical Violations in Nadiem Makarim Corruption Case

From Republika · () Indonesian

Translated from Indonesian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources In the courts
  • Indonesia's Judicial Commission (KY) received a report alleging ethical violations by four judges who ruled on a corruption case involving former Education Minister Nadiem Makarim.
  • Nadiem was sentenced to 10 years in prison for corruption related to the procurement of Chromebooks and management devices for the Ministry of Education.
  • The KY stated it will professionally examine the report without delving into the judicial substance of the verdict, while also monitoring the appeal process.

Indonesia's Judicial Commission (KY) has confirmed it received a report accusing four judges of the Jakarta Corruption Court of violating ethical codes during the trial of former Minister of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology, Nadiem Anwar Makarim. The report was filed by Nadiem's legal team.

Nadiem was previously sentenced to 10 years in prison, fined Rp1 billion, and ordered to pay Rp809 billion in restitution for corruption charges. The case involved the procurement of Chromebooks and Chrome Device Management systems within the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology during his tenure.

KY is ready to follow up on the report received.

โ€” Anita KadirKY spokesperson, confirming the commission's receipt and intention to process the ethical violation report against judges.

KY spokesperson Anita Kadir stated that the commission is open to the report and will follow its procedures. "KY is ready to follow up on the report received," Anita said. The commission previously monitored the trial due to public interest. Anita emphasized that the KY would analyze the report professionally to investigate potential ethical breaches by the judges, stressing that the commission does not have the authority to review the judicial merits of the verdict itself.

The KY also indicated it would continue to monitor the appeal process initiated by Nadiem's legal team, aiming to ensure judicial integrity throughout the proceedings. The commission committed to responding swiftly and transparently regarding the progress of the report's examination.

KY does not have the authority to review the judicial merits of the verdict itself.

โ€” Anita KadirKY spokesperson, clarifying the commission's scope of investigation regarding the Nadiem Makarim case.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Republika in Indonesian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.