DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil /Economy & Trade

Judicial Deposits and Special Funds Move Billions With Little Transparency

From Folha de S.Paulo · () Portuguese

Translated from Portuguese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • Judicial deposits and special funds in Brazil involve billions of reais with limited transparency, according to a Folha de S.Paulo report.
  • These funds, generated from court cases and judicial fees, are managed by banks that pay courts for exclusive administration, yielding significant returns for the judiciary.
  • The lack of standardized public disclosure makes it difficult for citizens to access information about how these vast sums are managed and used by the courts.

Billions of reais are being moved through judicial deposits and special funds in Brazil, yet transparency surrounding these vast sums remains critically low, a Folha de S.Paulo investigation reveals. Judicial deposits are funds from litigants held in bank accounts managed by judges as guarantees until a final court decision. With over 76 million pending cases, the accumulated amounts are immense; the Sรฃo Paulo Court of Justice (TJ-SP) alone held R$ 100 billion in judicial deposits in 2023.

These dormant funds generate substantial interest. Courts contract banks to manage these resources, receiving periodic payments in exchange for exclusive administration. For instance, TJ-SP's contract with Banco do Brasil yielded R$ 3.7 billion in 2024. However, details on which courts receive how much, from which banks, under what conditions, and how the money is used are not easily accessible to the public.

This opacity poses a governance problem for the judiciary itself. A recent incident highlighted this when judges at the Maranhรฃo Court of Justice discovered their president had unilaterally transferred R$ 2.8 billion in judicial deposits from Banco do Brasil to Banco de Brasรญlia (BRB), a move that bypassed the court's collective decision-making body and reportedly led to heated disputes.

Further complicating transparency are special funds, often financed by judicial fees and bank remuneration from deposit management. These funds operate outside the ordinary budget, allowing for flexible spending on everything from computers to unspecified expenses. While information access is slightly better than for deposits, it remains inadequate. For example, in 2025, TJ-SP reported R$ 8.4 billion, TJ-MG R$ 4.2 billion, TJ-RS R$ 2.2 billion, and TJ-PR R$ 889 million. Compiling this data required extensive searching across disparate sources, making it practically impossible for ordinary citizens to track these funds.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Folha de S.Paulo in Portuguese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.