Justice Halts Elimination of 'Volver al Trabajo' Plan Amid Piquetero Tensions

In a significant legal challenge to the government's austerity measures, an Argentine federal judge has intervened to halt the planned elimination of the "Volver al Trabajo" social program. Judge Adrián González Charvay of Campana issued a preliminary injunction, siding with a group of beneficiaries who argued that the cessation of the subsidy constitutes a "regressive measure in terms of social rights and unconstitutionality by omission." The ruling mandates that the national government, specifically the Ministry of Human Capital led by Sandra Pettovello, must continue payments of ARS 78,000 to beneficiaries.

The "Volver al Trabajo" program, which supports individuals engaged in the "popular economy"—often those in precarious socioeconomic situations without formal employment—was slated for replacement with training vouchers. This move by Minister Pettovello had ignited strong opposition from various "piquetero" (protestor) groups, who organized demonstrations against the plan's termination. The judge's decision underscores the vulnerability of these social programs and the legal recourse available to those who depend on them for their primary income.

“

the National State-Ministry of Human Capital must maintain the validity of the economic benefits that beneficiaries of the Volver al Trabajo Program were receiving, within three days of notification of the present and until a final sentence is issued, under penalty of applying fines for each day of delay.

Judge González Charvay's decision invoked the "100 Rules of Brasilia" on access to justice for vulnerable populations, emphasizing the judiciary's role in defending the rights of those facing significant obstacles. The plaintiffs, who identified themselves as workers in community kitchens, drug rehabilitation centers, and as recyclers, argued they are in "situations of extreme structural socioeconomic vulnerability." This legal battle, as reported by La Nación, highlights the deep social and economic fault lines in Argentina and the ongoing tension between the government's fiscal policies and the protection of social safety nets for its most vulnerable citizens.

“

constitutes a regressive measure in terms of social rights and unconstitutionality by omission.