Justice Minister Accuses Prosecution of Aiding "Elimination of Political Rivals"
Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- Justice Minister Cho Sung-ho asserted that the prosecution under President Yoon Suk-yeol actively aided in eliminating political rivals and must rectify its actions.
- Cho criticized the prosecution's extensive use of searches and interrogations in politically charged cases, calling it indefensible even for a legal professional.
- He urged the Ministry of Justice and the prosecution to confront and correct past wrongdoings, not just those from authoritarian regimes but also recent transgressions.
Justice Minister Cho Sung-ho has delivered a scathing critique of the prosecution's conduct during the current Yoon Suk-yeol administration, asserting that it has actively participated in the "elimination of political rivals." Speaking via Facebook, Cho directly addressed the public's criticism that the prosecution, under the leadership of Yoon himself, has abandoned political neutrality and become a tool for political persecution.
The prosecution has faced public criticism that it has actively aided in the elimination of his political rivals throughout his term, after the former prosecutor general, Yoon Suk-yeol, who led the prosecution, turned his back on political neutrality and went straight into politics.
Cho highlighted the prosecution's extensive use of investigative measures, including hundreds of raids and over a hundred suspect interrogations, in politically sensitive cases. He described these actions, revealed during parliamentary inspections, as "wrongdoings that are difficult to defend, even for someone who has been in the legal field for over 30 years." This strong condemnation from the Justice Minister himself signals a deep rift within the government and a public acknowledgment of the prosecution's controversial tactics.
The investigative practices in political cases, revealed during the parliamentary audit, such as hundreds of raids and over 100 suspect summonses, are wrongdoings that are difficult to defend, even for someone who has been in the legal field for over 30 years.
Furthermore, Cho emphasized the inherent duty of prosecutors to uphold justice and the rule of law. He argued that if there are strong suspicions that prosecutors have violated due process, it is their responsibility to investigate, uncover the truth, and correct such errors. This call for internal reform extends beyond historical wrongdoings of authoritarian regimes, urging the prosecution to confront and rectify "wrongdoings that have occurred right before our eyes."
It is only right that prosecutors investigate suspicions that they have violated due process, reveal the truth, and correct them to realize justice.
From a South Korean perspective, Minister Cho's public statement is a significant development. It reflects a growing concern among legal and political circles about the politicization of the justice system. While the prosecution has historically wielded considerable power, its perceived alignment with the ruling party under President Yoon has drawn sharp criticism. Cho's remarks, coming from the Justice Minister, lend weight to these concerns and suggest a potential internal push for accountability within the legal establishment. This situation is viewed not merely as a political dispute but as a fundamental issue concerning the integrity and impartiality of South Korea's judicial institutions.
The Ministry of Justice and the prosecution must face and correct not only the mistakes of authoritarian regimes decades ago but also the wrongdoings that have occurred right before our eyes.
Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.