DistantNews
Support us
Justice struggle in earthquakes from August 17 to February 6: 'Zero public officials punished in Marmara earthquake'
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Turkey /Disasters & Emergencies

Justice struggle in earthquakes from August 17 to February 6: 'Zero public officials punished in Marmara earthquake'

From Cumhuriyet · () Turkish

Translated from Turkish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • A legal expert highlights that no public officials were punished after the 1999 Marmara earthquake, and only one contractor served a sentence, later resuming his business.
  • The expert criticizes past and present government policies, including the

A legal expert has criticized Turkey's handling of earthquake-related justice, pointing to a lack of accountability for public officials and contractors following major seismic events.

The number of public officials who were punished and served their sentences after the Marmara earthquake is zero.

โ€” Av. H. Cihat AรงฤฑkalฤฑnCommenting on the lack of accountability for public officials after the 1999 Marmara earthquake.

Hukukรงu and ADD Hatay Branch President Av. H. Cihat Aรงฤฑkalฤฑn stated that 27 years after the 1999 Gรถlcรผk earthquake, the nation has still not learned from its mistakes. He noted that a scientific committee formed after the quake, initially effective in disaster management, was later disbanded due to political interference. Aรงฤฑkalฤฑn also condemned the "construction amnesty" policy, which he believes allowed citizens to build their own coffins.

"The number of public officials who were punished and served their sentences after the Marmara earthquake is zero," Aรงฤฑkalฤฑn said. He added that only one contractor was imprisoned but later released due to sentence reductions and continued his work. This bureaucratic approach, he argued, continues to prevail, with laws and lengthy trials shielding responsible officials from justice.

The scientific committee, which was initially very functional and competent in disaster management, was later disbanded because it did not serve the distorted functioning of politics.

โ€” Av. H. Cihat AรงฤฑkalฤฑnCriticizing the political interference that led to the disbandment of a post-earthquake scientific committee.

Aรงฤฑkalฤฑn also criticized the legal proceedings for the February 6 earthquakes, stating that many cases involving public officials are still awaiting investigation permits. He described the trials as being built on "conscious negligence," leading to the release of many defendants. The constant changes in parole laws make it difficult to find hope in these proceedings.

We are still awaiting investigation permits for cases involving public officials.

โ€” Av. H. Cihat AรงฤฑkalฤฑnDescribing the slow pace of legal proceedings for the February 6 earthquakes.

He further accused some bar associations of mismanaging the legal process, with some bar presidents even representing defendants in cases related to the devastating earthquakes. Aรงฤฑkalฤฑn called for special legal regulations to end illegal construction, reinstate a scientific committee to oversee urban planning and disaster risk reduction, ensure swift judicial processes for public officials, and restrict arbitrary zoning changes by local governments. He also emphasized the need for citizen participation in urban planning decisions.

The sacred right to defense must be upheld, but a bar president should never undertake the defense of a defendant in the face of such great social tragedy.

โ€” Av. H. Cihat AรงฤฑkalฤฑnExpressing disapproval of bar presidents representing defendants in earthquake-related cases.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Cumhuriyet in Turkish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.