Lack of quorum may mean shareholders’ resolution never legally existed
Translated from Polish and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- A court found that a shareholders’ resolution adopted without the required quorum may not represent the company’s will.
- The ruling concerned a limited liability company whose articles required shareholders representing at least 80% of the capital for valid resolutions.
- The case was brought by the daughter of a deceased shareholder who held half of the company, against the company and resolutions adopted at a shareholders’ meeting.
A court has ruled that a shareholders’ resolution adopted without the required quorum may be treated as if it never legally existed.
The case involved a limited liability company with two shareholders, each holding 50% of the shares. The company agreement required shareholders representing at least 80% of the capital to be present for resolutions to be valid.
The plaintiff, identified as A. Z., is the daughter of W. Z., a deceased shareholder who owned half of the company. She sued the company, seeking a finding that resolutions adopted at a shareholders’ meeting did not exist.
The court held that passing a resolution without the required quorum may prevent the resolution from being attributed to the will of the company. Such a defect can qualify as grounds for treating the resolution as nonexistent.
Originally published by Rzeczpospolita in Polish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.