Lamichhane warns 2/3 majority alone not enough for constitutional amendment
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Rabi Lamichhane, chair of Nepal's Rastriya Swatantra Party, stated that a two-thirds majority is insufficient for constitutional amendment.
- He urged party lawmakers to be cautious when discussing constitutional changes.
- Lamichhane emphasized the need for careful consideration beyond simple numerical majorities.
Rabi Lamichhane, the chairman of Nepal's Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP), has cautioned that securing a two-thirds majority in the House of Representatives alone is not enough to amend the country's constitution. His remarks were made during a meeting of the House State Affairs and Good Governance Committee. Lamichhane advised RSP lawmakers to exercise prudence and thorough consideration when the topic of constitutional amendment arises. He suggested that the political and legal complexities surrounding such changes require more than just a numerical advantage in parliament. The statement implies a need for broader consensus and careful deliberation on any proposed amendments to Nepal's foundational law. Lamichhane's emphasis on caution signals a potentially more conservative approach to constitutional reform within his party. This stance highlights the significant political hurdles and the nuanced discussions required for any significant changes to Nepal's governing framework, suggesting that legislative power must be wielded with strategic foresight.
Originally published by OnlineKhabar English. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.