DistantNews
Support us
Law Firm Denies Sending 'Amicus Curiae' in Ex-AGP's Pre-trial Hearing
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia /Crime & Justice

Law Firm Denies Sending 'Amicus Curiae' in Ex-AGP's Pre-trial Hearing

From CNN Indonesia · () Indonesian

Translated from Indonesian and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Named sources In the courts
  • A law firm was mentioned as submitting an 'amicus curiae' brief in the pre-trial hearing of former Assistant Attorney General for Special Crimes, Febrie Adriansyah.
  • Febrie's legal team requested to see the document, stating they had not received a copy.
  • Bambang Widjojanto, a former KPK deputy chairman associated with the firm, denied sending any such brief.

During a pre-trial hearing on Wednesday, Febrie Adriansyah's legal team requested access to an 'amicus curiae' brief reportedly submitted by the law firm Widjojanto, Sonhaji & Associates. Febrie's lawyer, Firman Wijaya, asked the presiding judge to display the document, explaining that his team had not yet received a copy. "In the previous hearing, Your Honor read an amicus curiae submitted by Mr. Bambang Widjojanto. If permitted, can we get a copy of this amicus curiae?" Wijaya inquired.

In the previous hearing, Your Honor read an amicus curiae submitted by Mr. Bambang Widjojanto. If permitted, can we get a copy of this amicus curiae?

โ€” Firman WijayaFebrie Adriansyah's lawyer, requesting access to the amicus curiae document during the pre-trial hearing.

Presiding Judge Richard Edwin Basoeki confirmed that the South Jakarta District Court had received the amicus curiae. He clarified that his previous statement was to ascertain if all parties had received a copy. "So what I conveyed yesterday was to ensure whether the parties had received the copies, which we obtained was sent to us," the judge explained. "Whether it arrived or not, we have no authority. We only informed the parties that this court, in this case the judge examining the case, received the letter and the letter was also addressed to cases 134 and 135," he added.

So what I conveyed yesterday was to ensure whether the parties had received the copies, which we obtained was sent to us.

โ€” Richard Edwin BasoekiThe presiding judge explaining the court's process regarding the amicus curiae.

Following the judge's response, both Febrie's legal team and the Attorney General's Office legal team requested to view the amicus curiae. Judge Basoeki presented the document, allowing both sides to examine it directly, though he did not read its contents aloud. The document was reportedly sent to the court concerning cases 134 and 135.

Whether it arrived or not, we have no authority. We only informed the parties that this court, in this case the judge examining the case, received the letter and the letter was also addressed to cases 134 and 135.

โ€” Richard Edwin BasoekiThe presiding judge clarifying the court's role in handling the amicus curiae.

However, in a separate confirmation, former Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) deputy chairman Bambang Widjojanto denied any involvement. "I have never created or signed an Amicus Curiae," Widjojanto stated. Previously, Febrie had asked the South Jakarta District Court's sole judge to nullify his detention by the Attorney General's Office, deeming the detention order invalid and without legal binding force. The Attorney General's Office, however, maintains that the suspect designation and money laundering investigation are based on valid legal grounds.

I have never created or signed an Amicus Curiae.

โ€” Bambang WidjojantoDenying his involvement in submitting an amicus curiae brief.
About this summary

Originally published by CNN Indonesia in Indonesian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.