Left-wing Lawyer Slams Tisza Party's Fundamental Law Amendment

The proposed amendment to Hungary's Fundamental Law by the Tisza party has ignited a firestorm of criticism from legal experts, who are dissecting the proposed limitations on the prime ministerial term. Prominent legal minds, such as Tamás Lattman, have taken to social media to voice their strong objections, specifically targeting the proposed restriction on the prime minister's mandate. Lattman's critique suggests the amendment is not only poorly conceived but also potentially vulnerable.

“

This wording is shit

Further compounding the concerns, Béla Pokol, a former constitutional judge, has pointed out what he sees as the clear underlying motive behind the proposal: to preemptively block Viktor Orbán from running for office again in the future. While Pokol acknowledges that a future two-thirds parliamentary majority could theoretically reverse such a constitutional amendment, this observation does little to assuage the immediate concerns about the current proposal's intent and legality.

“

The proposal clearly aims to exclude Orbán's future candidacy.

The legal community's reaction, as highlighted by the article, is one of significant disapproval. The phrasing and substance of the amendment are being described in harsh terms, with one legal professional quoted as saying, "This wording is shit." This strong sentiment underscores the depth of dissatisfaction and the perceived flaws in the Tisza party's attempt to alter the nation's highest law. From a Hungarian perspective, such attempts to manipulate constitutional law for political expediency are often met with skepticism and strong opposition, especially when they appear to target specific individuals or political outcomes.

“

If there is another two-thirds majority, the restriction can be reversed by constitutional amendment.