DistantNews
Losing Six Months by Just Sending Demand Letters: How Landlords Can Respond to Rent Arrears

Losing Six Months by Just Sending Demand Letters: How Landlords Can Respond to Rent Arrears

From Dong-A Ilbo · (2d ago) Korean Critical tone

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

TLDR

  • Landlords are losing money due to tenants delaying rent payments and refusing to vacate after lease termination.
  • A common mistake is relying solely on demand letters, which are insufficient for eviction and allow unpaid rent to accumulate.
  • Legal action, including a lawsuit for eviction and a preliminary seizure of property, is necessary, but early strategic planning is crucial to minimize financial losses.

The escalating issue of tenants delaying rent payments and refusing to leave after their leases expire is causing significant financial distress for landlords across South Korea.

Many landlords make the mistake of only sending demand letters and waiting for the situation to resolve.

— Uhm Jung-sook, Lawyer at Beopdo Law FirmThis quote explains a common but ineffective approach landlords take when dealing with rent arrears.

Many landlords find themselves in a difficult position, hesitant to take immediate action and often resorting to sending demand letters. However, as legal experts point out, these letters are merely a formal notification and do not compel a tenant to vacate. This passive approach allows unpaid rent to pile up, eroding the security deposit and preventing the landlord from finding new, reliable tenants. The financial losses, therefore, don't just add up; they compound, much like interest.

The key is initial planning. Filing for a preliminary injunction to prevent the transfer of possession simultaneously with the lawsuit is essential to shorten the overall duration.

— Uhm Jung-sook, Lawyer at Beopdo Law FirmThis quote highlights the importance of strategic legal steps beyond just filing a lawsuit.

The legal process for reclaiming property, known as a '명도소송' (Myeongdo Sosong) or eviction lawsuit, is often seen as a last resort. However, simply initiating a lawsuit is not enough. Experts emphasize the critical importance of 'initial design' or strategic planning from the outset. This includes simultaneously filing for a preliminary injunction to prevent the transfer of possession ('점유이전금지가처분' - Jeomyu-ijeon-geumjigacheobun) alongside the eviction lawsuit. Failing to do so can render a favorable judgment useless if the tenant transfers possession to a third party during the legal proceedings, forcing the landlord to start the entire process over.

If the tenant has no assets, recovery is often difficult. Combining asset checks and wage garnishment from the beginning can increase the chances of recovery.

— Uhm Jung-sook, Lawyer at Beopdo Law FirmThis quote addresses the challenges of recovering unpaid rent even after winning a legal case.

Furthermore, even winning an eviction lawsuit doesn't guarantee financial recovery. The tenant's ability to pay outstanding rent is a major variable. If the tenant has no assets, enforcing the judgment for unpaid rent can be practically impossible. Therefore, landlords are advised to consider asset checks and potential garnishment of wages or other assets early in the process. The most effective strategy, legal professionals stress, is swift action at the first sign of delinquency. Waiting only exacerbates the problem, leading to a dual loss of unpaid rent and potential rental income from a new tenant.

The most certain method is to respond quickly at the beginning of the delinquency.

— Uhm Jung-sook, Lawyer at Beopdo Law FirmThis quote emphasizes the necessity of prompt action to mitigate losses.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Dong-A Ilbo in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.