Major Shift: Support for Israel Erodes in US House
Translated from Indonesian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The U.S. House of Representatives rejected a proposal to halt all aid to Israel, but the vote revealed a significant shift within the Democratic Party.
- A majority of House Democrats voted in favor of or abstained on an amendment to cut $3.3 billion in military and humanitarian aid.
- This vote signals a growing division within the Democratic leadership and a departure from decades of near-unconditional support for Israel.
The U.S. House of Representatives recently voted against a proposal to completely halt American aid to Israel. However, the outcome of the vote exposed a dramatic shift within the Democratic Party, revealing a significant departure from its decades-long stance of nearly unconditional support for the nation.
Although I wish we could vote for an amendment that only targeted military aid, and of course continue to support humanitarian programs, we do not have that option.
The amendment, introduced by Republican Representative Thomas Massie, sought to eliminate $3.3 billion in military and humanitarian assistance for Israel from a foreign affairs spending bill. While the amendment failed with a vote of 314 against and 104 in favor, the number of House Democrats supporting the measure was notable, with 103 voting for it and 98 against.
According to The New York Times, "more than half of the Democratic Caucus" either supported the measure or abstained. Many Democrats who supported the amendment, despite reservations about cutting humanitarian aid, stated it was their only opportunity to officially express opposition to Israel's policies in Gaza, the occupied West Bank, and Lebanon. Representative Greg Casar of Texas, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, urged colleagues to support the amendment, stating, "The American people are demanding an end to the use of U.S. taxpayer dollars to subsidize the Israeli military."
The American people are demanding an end to the use of U.S. taxpayer dollars to subsidize the Israeli military.
Even key Democratic leaders showed signs of wavering. Representative Katherine Clark, the Democratic whip, supported the amendment despite her own doubts, saying, "I believe we must change course." Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called the proposal "an unfortunate choice" but stated she would support it "for the message it sends."
I believe we must change course.
The vote highlighted deep divisions within the Democratic leadership. Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and House Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar voted against the amendment, while Clark supported it. The New York Times reported that Jeffries held two unusual caucus meetings specifically to discuss the issue, reflecting the intensifying debate over Israel within the party. Despite voting against the amendment, Jeffries also called for a "major overhaul" of the U.S.-Israel relationship for the first time.
an unfortunate choice
Originally published by Republika in Indonesian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.