Man Gets 15 Years for Killing Acquaintance After Drinking Brawl

A South Korean court has upheld a 15-year prison sentence for a 60-year-old man convicted of fatally stabbing an acquaintance after a drunken argument. The appellate court dismissed appeals filed by both the prosecution and the defense, confirming the original sentence.

“

Looking at the defendant's motive and the circumstances of the crime, there are no circumstances that can be taken into consideration, and the method of the crime is also of poor quality.

The incident took place in December 2025 at a studio apartment in Gunsan, North Jeolla Province. The defendant, identified as Mr. A, engaged in a verbal dispute with the victim, Mr. B, also in his 60s, while they were drinking. The argument escalated, leading Mr. A to fatally stab Mr. B with a knife.

Following the stabbing, Mr. A contacted the police and initially reported that Mr. B had inflicted the wounds on himself. However, under police questioning at the scene, he admitted to wielding the knife. He was subsequently arrested as a suspect in the act.

“

Considering that no effort has been made to recover the victim's losses, severe punishment is unavoidable.

Investigations revealed that the two men had a history of loud arguments while drinking at Mr. A's residence, which had previously drawn complaints from neighbors. The first trial court emphasized the severity of the crime, noting the lack of mitigating circumstances for the defendant's motive and method, and his failure to make any efforts toward restitution for the victim. The prosecution had initially sought a 20-year sentence.

“

After reviewing the various sentencing factors that appeared in the record and the arguments of this case, it is difficult to see that there has been a fundamental change in the sentencing conditions.

In its decision, the appellate court stated that a review of the case records and arguments did not reveal any substantial changes in the sentencing factors. Therefore, the original sentence was deemed neither excessively harsh nor lenient, falling within the court's reasonable discretionary range.

“

Therefore, the original sentence does not appear to be unreasonably excessive or lenient, and does not seem to fall outside the reasonable range of discretion.