DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden /Crime & Justice

Mastermind behind Louvre jewelry heist, valued at nearly $100 million, still at large

From Svenska Dagbladet · () Swedish

Translated from Swedish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Under investigation
  • Two men stole nearly a billion kronor worth of jewelry from the Louvre museum in a heist that occurred just days after their recruitment.
  • The perpetrators received a reward of approximately 200,000 kronor for the theft.
  • The mastermind behind the operation, however, remains at large.

The intricate planning behind a brazen heist at the Louvre Museum, which saw jewelry worth nearly a billion Swedish kronor stolen, is still unfolding, with the architect of the crime remaining free. The two men who executed the theft were reportedly recruited just days before the operation, highlighting the swiftness with which the plan was put into motion.

Instructed to shatter the display case and seize the jewels, the two perpetrators received a video of the Galerie dโ€™Apollon, the targeted hall within the world-renowned museum. Three days later, they were en route to the museum, ready to carry out the audacious act. Their reward for successfully executing the theft was a sum of around 200,000 Swedish kronor, a fraction of the immense value of the stolen items.

While the two individuals directly involved in the theft have been apprehended or identified, the investigation continues to focus on the individual who masterminded the operation. This figure, still at large, represents the key to understanding the full scope of the criminal enterprise and potentially recovering the stolen treasures. The disparity between the reward paid and the value of the stolen goods suggests a sophisticated network with significant financial interests.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Svenska Dagbladet in Swedish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.