DistantNews
Support us

Mendonça and Moraes turn Brazil’s Supreme Court into a game of truco as Fachin delays restoring order

From Estadão · () Portuguese

Translated from Portuguese and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

Opinion Named sources Under investigation
  • The article criticizes Justice André Mendonça’s decision to suspend Federal Police Director-General Andrei Rodrigues, arguing that it escalates a crisis within Brazil’s Supreme Court.
  • It questions whether intelligence reports prove that Rodrigues was illegally monitored and says the dispute reflects the risks of decisions made by individual justices.
  • Ten former Supreme Court presidents called the facts “extremely serious” and urged Chief Justice Edson Fachin to convene a public session to order an investigation.

Brazil’s Supreme Court has begun to resemble a card table, the article argues, with justices raising the stakes instead of restoring institutional restraint. It compares André Mendonça’s decision to suspend Federal Police Director-General Andrei Rodrigues with calling for a decisive move in truco, a Brazilian card game, in the hope of ending the contest quickly.

illegally

· André MendonçaThe article quotes Mendonça’s characterization of the alleged Federal Police monitoring.

Mendonça relied on a precedent created by Alexandre de Moraes, the article says, using a unilateral decision to remove Rodrigues after a party complaint from Novo. The decision came during an election campaign. In 2020, the PDT used a similar move to block Alexandre Ramagem from taking the same post after Jair Bolsonaro appointed him following Sérgio Moro’s resignation. Moraes granted an injunction then, and the full court upheld it.

The article questions Mendonça’s claim that the Federal Police had “illegally” monitored him. Producing an intelligence report, it argues, does not by itself prove that an operation took place. Intelligence gathering and operational activity are separate functions, meaning a report can describe a scenario without showing that the person involved was monitored or spied on. The central issue, it says, is how intelligence reports are used.

extremely serious

· Ten former Supreme Court presidentsThey used the phrase in a letter about the events and called for a public session.

The dispute has also drawn criticism from ten former Supreme Court presidents, who called the facts “extremely serious.” They asked Fachin to urgently schedule a public session so the full court could order a rigorous investigation. The article argues that the Court must urgently curb unilateral rulings and recover the gravity, honor and sense of duty associated with justice.

public session so that the full court may order an immediate and rigorous investigation

· Ten former Supreme Court presidentsThe former justices urged Chief Justice Edson Fachin to respond to the dispute.
About this summary

Originally published by Estadão in Portuguese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.