NDC PRIMARIES AND THE AFTERMATH

The National Democratic Congress (NDC) has become a political platform for diverse tendencies, notably attracting supporters of Peter Obi and Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso. Both politicians bring significant electoral appeal and grassroots support, injecting fresh energy and enthusiasm into the NDC. Their alliance was viewed by supporters as a vehicle for political renewal and a credible challenge to the established political order.

However, the aftermath of party primaries has seen high emotions and colliding expectations. Disappointed aspirants are seeking explanations, and facts are often overshadowed by sentiments, leading to accusations against political actors for events beyond their control. This situation appears to be unfolding within the NDC, where an internal exercise to select candidates has devolved into a blame game in some quarters.

Aspirants who failed to secure party tickets are looking beyond established party structures, directing frustrations at Peter Obi, Kwankwaso, the Obidient Movement, and the Kwankwasiya Movement. This controversy raises a critical question: who should be held responsible for the outcome of the NDC primaries? The answer, though perhaps politically inconvenient, is necessary for strengthening democratic institutions.

Political excitement can sometimes foster unrealistic expectations. For some aspirants, affiliation with the Obidient or Kwankwasiya Movements may have created a belief that party tickets would be automatic. The assumption was that if Obi and Kwankwaso were the most popular figures, their followers should receive preferential treatment. This narrative, while politically appealing, overlooks the realities of party administration and the principles of internal party democracy. It's important to note that Obi and Kwankwaso, along with many supporters, are relatively new entrants to the NDC, joining recently.