DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan /Disasters & Emergencies

Nepal Flood Disaster Sparks Claims That China Is to Blame, Putting Belt and Road Projects Under Fire

From Liberty Times · () Chinese

Translated from Chinese and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Named sources Ongoing story
  • Catastrophic flooding and landslides struck the Nepal-Tibet border on Aug. 26, with Nepal reporting more than 1,000 deaths and over 3,900 people missing by Sept. 1.
  • The disaster has renewed criticism of China-backed infrastructure projects in the ecologically and geologically fragile Himalayas, although no evidence shows Chinese projects directly caused the glacier collapse.
  • China has rejected allegations of underreporting casualties and censoring disaster coverage, calling the accusations politically motivated and unfounded.

More than 1,000 people had died and over 3,900 were missing in Nepal by Sept. 1 after catastrophic flooding and landslides struck the border with Tibet. The disaster has now placed Chinaโ€™s sweeping infrastructure drive in the Himalayas, including projects linked to the Belt and Road Initiative, back under intense scrutiny.

There is no evidence showing that Chinese infrastructure directly caused this disaster, and of course it cannot be said that the related projects triggered the event.

โ€” Rahul ShivshankarThe News18 journalist assessed claims linking Chinese infrastructure to the glacier collapse.

Floodwaters and mudslides appeared along the Nepal-Tibet frontier on Aug. 26, swallowing roads and bridges and striking the gates of a border crossing. Geological experts linked the disaster to a sudden glacier collapse after days of rain. Chinese officials warned that other unstable glaciers remained at risk of collapse and urged residents in high-altitude areas to prepare for evacuation.

The contrasting casualty figures have fueled suspicion. Nepal reported more than 1,000 deaths and over 3,900 missing people, while Chinese authorities had reported 16 deaths and 546 missing in Tibet by the weekend. Critics questioned whether the Chinese figures reflected the full scale of the disaster. The report also said Chinese authorities blocked journalists from entering some affected areas and censored flood footage online. Chinaโ€™s cybersecurity authorities announced administrative penalties against 10 people accused of spreading online rumors and false information, including people who questioned the official death toll.

Human intervention in a highly unstable and sensitive geographic environment.

โ€” Rahul ShivshankarShivshankar described the risks of large-scale construction in the Himalayas.

As attention turned to the disaster, Tibetan activists, journalists and other observers also questioned the consequences of Chinaโ€™s large-scale development in the region. There is no conclusive evidence that any Chinese infrastructure project directly triggered the glacier collapse, but critics warn that major construction can damage an already unstable ecosystem. Projects cited include the Medog Hydropower Station in Tibet, which China describes as potentially one of the worldโ€™s largest hydropower facilities, and infrastructure in Nepal associated with the Belt and Road Initiative.

Ideological bias

โ€” Chinese Embassy in ArgentinaThe embassy used the phrase to criticize claims linking the disaster to Chinese development projects.

Concerns over Chinese dams in Tibet have also persisted in India, where some observers fear they could become โ€œwater bombsโ€ in a conflict. News18 journalist Rahul Shivshankar said there was โ€œno evidence showing that Chinese infrastructure directly caused this disaster,โ€ but described large-scale construction in the region as โ€œhuman intervention in a highly unstable and sensitive geographic environment.โ€ Chinaโ€™s embassy in Argentina and Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun rejected what they called ideological and malicious speculation, saying China had released information openly, transparently and promptly and opposing the politicization of a natural disaster.

Open, transparent and timely

โ€” Guo JiakunThe Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman described how China had released disaster information.
About this summary

Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.