Nicușor Dan Faces Criticism from His Own Voters: 'You Responded to Critics with Arrogance'. The Letter Addressed by Civil Society

A significant wave of criticism is directed at President Nicușor Dan from the very civil society groups that once championed his cause. Adevărul reports on an open letter penned by these organizations, expressing profound disappointment and concern over the direction of his presidency.

“

Mr. President, The undersigned organizations and civic groups address this open letter to you, profoundly concerned about the direction in which you have chosen to exercise your mandate – a mandate won on the basis of a clear commitment to citizens, in an already highly radicalized political context.

The letter frames the relationship between citizens and their elected officials as a social contract, built on explicit promises. The signatories argue that Dan has failed to uphold these promises, which were the foundation of his electoral success. Instead of delivering a functional state and genuine reforms, they contend that his actions have maintained the existing problematic structures, often referred to as the 'status quo.'

“

In a functional democracy, the relationship between voter and politician is based on a genuine social contract. It is a mutual relationship, in which citizens choose to support a candidate based on explicit clauses – public promises. These are not mere campaign statements, but moral and political obligations.

What appears to be a particularly sore point is Dan's alleged response to criticism. The civil society groups accuse him of meeting legitimate concerns not with reasoned arguments but with 'arrogance' and a 'mimicry of cynicism.' They feel betrayed, stating that those who actively supported his campaign and bore personal costs for his rise have been treated with 'superiority.' This sentiment suggests a disconnect between the president's public persona and the expectations of his core supporters.

“

You were elected on a wave of hope: the promise of a functional state, free from political interference, an independent justice system, and authentic administrative and electoral reforms. Today, almost a year after taking office, we are forced to note not only that these objectives have not been achieved, but that your actions continue to support the status quo.

The letter also touches upon sensitive issues within Romania's justice system. The appointment of Lia Savonea to head the High Court of Cassation and Justice is singled out as a negative signal regarding judicial independence. Furthermore, the signatories lament Dan's perceived silence on broader systemic issues within the judiciary, especially when other magistrates have publicly raised concerns backed by evidence. This perceived inaction or misstep is seen as a continuation of practices from the previous administration, further eroding public trust.

“

You have responded to critics not with arguments, but with arrogance, and not with responsibility, but through a mimicry of the specific cynicism of those you promised to combat.