No, daycare is not harmful
Translated from Norwegian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The article discusses the debate surrounding the safety of sending one-year-olds to daycare in Norway.
- It refutes claims that daycare is harmful, citing a lack of scientific documentation to support such assertions.
- The author argues that politicians should not base advice to parents on personal feelings and emphasizes the need for policies that support parents who wish to stay home with their children.
This opinion piece from Aftenposten addresses a sensitive topic in Norwegian society: the early entry of children into daycare. The author directly challenges the notion that sending one-year-olds to kindergarten is harmful, a viewpoint that has surfaced in public debate, particularly from conservative political circles.
There is no documentation, either in Norway or elsewhere, that it is harmful for a one-year-old to be in kindergarten.
From a Norwegian standpoint, universal access to high-quality daycare is a cornerstone of social policy, enabling high female labor force participation and promoting early socialization for children. The article defends this system by referencing expert opinion, such as that of Professor Emerita May Britt Drugli, who states there is no documentation proving harm to one-year-olds in daycare. This scientific backing is crucial in a society that values evidence-based policy.
The author distinguishes between personal feelings and factual evidence, criticizing politicians who offer advice based on the former. The piece argues that while unhealthy food or excessive screen time are demonstrably harmful, daycare is not. This distinction is important for parents who may feel guilt or pressure regarding their childcare choices. The article aims to reassure parents that choosing daycare for their one-year-olds is a valid and safe option.
One can well feel that it is harmful, but a politician should not advise parents on the basis of their own feelings.
Furthermore, the piece touches upon the political aspect, suggesting that the debate is not about whether parents *should* be with their children, but about creating the conditions that allow them to do so if they wish. It implies that the criticism of daycare might stem from a desire to promote traditional family roles, while overlooking the societal and economic benefits of accessible childcare. The article concludes by reinforcing that daycare is a safe choice and that policy should focus on supporting parental choices, whether that involves returning to work or staying home.
The kindergarten does not replace parents, but becomes part of the child's care network.
Originally published by Aftenposten in Norwegian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.