DistantNews
Support us
🇹🇼 Taiwan /Elections & Politics

Online Celebrity Calls Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an a Political Fool, Citing Three “Major Mistakes”

From Liberty Times · () Chinese

Translated from Chinese and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

Opinion Named sources Ongoing story
  • Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s eldest son was selected for a Taipei international exchange program with only 25 places, despite holding U.S. citizenship, prompting public criticism.
  • Influencer Chen Yen-chang, known as “Mr. 486,” accused Chiang of taking a place intended for families needing assistance and questioned why a U.S. citizen would use an exchange-student route to study in the United States.
  • Chen said Chiang’s decision to reject the subsidy failed to address concerns about procedural fairness, conflicts of interest and the use of a scarce public resource.

Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an is facing criticism over his eldest son’s selection for a city-funded international exchange program, after reports noted that the son holds U.S. citizenship. The program has only 25 places and provides subsidies of NT$75,000 to NT$200,000 to help ordinary families send their children abroad.

Chiang Wan-an is simply a political fool, and this incident exposes his stupidity.

· Chen Yen-changChen opened his social-media criticism of the Taipei mayor.

Business group-buying influencer Chen Yen-chang, widely known as “Mr. 486,” attacked Chiang in a social-media post and called him “a political fool.” Chen said the controversy was not mainly about the amount of money, but about whether the application made sense and whether it displaced applicants the program was designed to help.

Chen argued that Chiang’s family did not need the subsidy. He pointed to campaign funding of NT$17 million that had gone directly into Chiang’s personal account during the previous election, saying the mayor could afford to send his son to the United States without public assistance. Chen said applying for one of the limited places amounted to competing with families facing greater financial pressure.

You do not need this subsidy, so why compete for it?

· Chen Yen-changHe argued that Chiang’s family should not have applied for a limited place intended to reduce the burden on ordinary families.

After the controversy intensified, Chiang said his son would not take the subsidy. The city’s Education Bureau said the money could not be passed to another applicant even if he declined it. Chen said that response missed the central issue, which he identified as procedural fairness and avoidance of conflicts of interest.

Your son is American, so why go to the United States as an exchange student?

· Chen Yen-changHe questioned the logic of using the city’s exchange program when Chiang’s son holds U.S. citizenship.

Because the program is administered by the city’s Education Bureau, Chen argued that the mayor’s son’s participation could appear privileged even if officials followed the rules. He also questioned why a child with U.S. citizenship would travel to the United States as an exchange student rather than apply directly to an American school. Chen concluded that declining the payment did not erase the concern over access to one of the 25 places.

Does refusing the money make everything fine? That proves you have missed the point.

· Chen Yen-changChen said rejecting the subsidy did not resolve concerns about fairness and conflicts of interest.
About this summary

Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.

More Stories

From Our Blog