DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan /Culture & Society

Opinion: AI Era Transforms Reading Methods, Not the Core of Scholarship

From Liberty Times · () Chinese

Translated from Chinese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

Opinion Named sources Context piece
  • The article discusses how Artificial Intelligence (AI) is changing the methods of reading and learning, rather than the fundamental principles of scholarship.
  • AI tools like Gemini can help create a "knowledge map" by summarizing texts and providing background context, serving as a preliminary step before engaging with original sources.
  • The author proposes a new learning cycle: AI-guided introduction, knowledge mapping, cross-disciplinary comparison, returning to original texts, reflective writing, AI-assisted debate, and re-engaging with original texts at a higher level.

In the age of Artificial Intelligence, the way we approach reading and learning is undergoing a transformation, according to an opinion piece in Liberty Times. The author, Xiao Xihui, argues that AI is not altering the core principle of scholarship, which Hu Shih described as building knowledge like a pyramid, broad and high, but rather revolutionizing the methods used to achieve it.

Traditionally, acquiring deep knowledge involved extensive reading across various disciplines, history, literature, philosophy, science, and integrating this with life experiences to form independent thought. AI tools, such as Gemini, can now accelerate the initial stages of this process. They can provide YouTube-style guided introductions, summarize complex texts, and help build a "knowledge map." This allows learners to quickly grasp the historical context, structural framework, and core issues of a subject before diving into the original source material.

However, the author emphasizes that this AI-assisted preparation is merely a preview, not the end goal. Whether studying religious texts like the Bible or the Quran, philosophical works like Lao Tzu or Zhuangzi, or epic poems like the Iliad, the ultimate step remains returning to the original texts for personal reading and contemplation. AI summaries and commentaries can aid understanding but cannot replace the act of direct engagement and critical thinking.

The new learning cycle proposed involves AI-guided introductions, creating knowledge maps, engaging in cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural comparisons, returning to original texts, reflective writing, using AI for debate and critique, and then revisiting the original texts from a more informed perspective. This "spiral reading" allows individuals to ascend to higher levels of understanding with each return to a source. AI helps broaden the base of knowledge, but personal experience and independent thought determine the ultimate height of one's intellectual pyramid.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.