Opinion: Argentina's elimination of Technical Directors in food plants risks safety standards

Argentina's decision to remove the mandatory requirement for a Technical Director in government-approved frigorific establishments has sparked a debate about the future of food safety and quality standards. Critics argue that this deregulation, driven by a desire to appear business-friendly, overlooks potential health risks and consequences.

For years, Technical Directors played a crucial role in slaughterhouses and animal product processing plants. They were responsible for overseeing and guaranteeing the correct implementation of Good Manufacturing Practices (BPM), Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures (POES), HACCP systems, and animal welfare programs. These professionals were key to preventing public health risks.

“

Eliminating the mandatory figure of the Technical Director is like having pharmacies without pharmacists.

While the National Agrifood Health and Quality Service (SENASA) remains the official health authority, its inspection role differs from the internal management provided by a Technical Director. Critics contend that conflating these roles misleads the public, suggesting that official oversight alone is sufficient and will reduce costs. However, they emphasize that food safety and quality are primarily the responsibility of the companies themselves, and having a dedicated professional on-site provides greater system-wide guarantees.

The elimination of this mandatory role is particularly concerning given the potential for some establishments to cut back on their food safety controls to prioritize economic gains. Furthermore, this move comes at a time of significant institutional weakness for SENASA, which has seen the departure of many professionals. The agency's attempts to hire new staff on a contract basis, rather than as permanent employees, are seen as a desperate measure that further undermines its critical mass of expertise.

“

The elimination of this mandatory figure generates concern due to the potential risk that some establishments may reduce the technical structure dedicated to ensuring safety, prioritizing economic aspects over health prevention.