DistantNews
Support us
Paraguay: "No money for medicine, but for empanadas," says opposition lawmaker

Paraguay: "No money for medicine, but for empanadas," says opposition lawmaker

From ABC Color · () Spanish

Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • Paraguayan opposition lawmaker Rubén Rubín criticized the government's response to a two-day strike by doctors demanding a salary increase.
  • Rubín alleged the government spends millions on catering and private health insurance for administrative staff while denying raises to medical professionals.
  • He argued that funds allocated for non-essential expenses could cover the doctors' salary demands, accusing the government of prioritizing party structures over public health.

A Paraguayan opposition lawmaker has sharply criticized the government's handling of a two-day doctors' strike, accusing officials of prioritizing lavish spending over essential public services. Rubén Rubín, an independent legislator, lambasted the administration of President Santiago Peña for claiming a lack of funds to meet the doctors' salary demands.

They say there's no money, but they spend millions on catering. There is money for empanadas.

— Rubén RubínThe opposition lawmaker criticized the government's spending priorities amidst a doctors' strike.

"They say there's no money, but they spend millions on catering. There is money for empanadas," Rubín stated, highlighting what he sees as misplaced priorities. He detailed significant state expenditures, including $100 million for private health insurance for administrative roles and $470 million in bonuses for advisors, while hospitals reportedly lack basic supplies.

Rubín further pointed to $20 million spent on catering and $65 million on travel and per diems, questioning the necessity of such expenses when medical professionals are struggling for better compensation. He asserted that these funds could easily cover the requested salary adjustments for doctors.

If we cannot fulfill our commitments to our doctors, our teachers, our public forces, what is the point of us forming a government?

— Rubén RubínThe lawmaker questioned the government's legitimacy if it cannot support essential public sector workers.

The lawmaker also criticized the government's focus on inaugurating new hospitals, suggesting these are mere public relations exercises. He claimed the administration uses public works projects for personal gain through inflated contracts, while the actual investment in healthcare remains insufficient. Rubín called for a reduction in state bureaucracy, arguing that many ministries serve only to maintain traditional party structures and political patronage.

We have ministries that serve no purpose. Nothing more than to sustain the structure of traditional parties. There is plenty of money. It is an insult to say there is no money, and even more so to say there is no money for doctors.

— Rubén RubínRubín accused the government of misallocating funds to political patronage instead of healthcare.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by ABC Color in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.