Piotr Kosmaty: Banning Banderaism propaganda is a good idea

A proposed ban on the "propaganda of Banderaism" is viewed favorably, suggesting that public glorification of certain historical ideologies should not be shielded. The core of the issue lies in the interpretation and public expression of Ukrainian nationalism, particularly concerning figures like Stepan Bandera and the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN).

The article specifically criticizes the idea of a Ukraine described as "pure as a golden wheat field without a single weed." This imagery evokes a nationalist vision that implies ethnic or national cleansing. Such a concept, which historically has been associated with the exclusion and persecution of minority groups, is deemed unacceptable for public endorsement.

Furthermore, the piece argues that ideologies promoting such exclusionary views, particularly those that have led to violence and discrimination against Poles, Russians, and Jews, should not benefit from protection under the guise of free speech or historical interpretation. The call for a ban reflects a stance that certain historical narratives and their modern-day propagation can be harmful and divisive, warranting regulatory action.

“

Public praise for ideas according to which Ukraine was to be 'as pure as a golden wheat field without a single weed,' free from Poles, Russians, Jews, should not be under a protective umbrella.