Poland Signs 120 Billion PLN Defense Deals Amidst EU Program Deadlines

Poland has finalized defense contracts totaling 120 billion Polish zloty (PLN), a procurement push reportedly dictated by the deadlines of the European Union's SAFE program. General Roman Polko, former commander of the elite GROM unit, has shed light on the behind-the-scenes urgency, suggesting that a deficiency in governmental strategy compelled the military to independently outline its requirements.

“

These agreements were prepared much earlier. It's not as if they started digging the proverbial well three days before because there was a fire, but the military was waiting.

The Ministry of National Defense rapidly concluded agreements for domestic military equipment, including Krab self-propelled howitzers, Borsuk infantry fighting vehicles, and ammunition. General Polko explained to "Super Express" that the haste in these purchases was not driven by the government's current marketing agenda but by strict EU procedures. "These agreements were prepared much earlier," Polko stated. "It's not as if they started digging the proverbial well three days before because there was a fire, but the military was waiting." He elaborated that the contracts had to be signed by the end of May to be eligible for funding under the SAFE program, emphasizing that without this step, Polish defense companies could not access these EU funds.

“

The contracts had to be signed by the end of May because only until the end of May can these purchases be realized by one country.

Polko criticized officials for a lack of long-term vision, shifting the responsibility for planning onto the military itself. He stressed that political leaders, not soldiers, should define the nation's defense framework. The general believes the sudden acceleration in contract finalization could have been avoided, noting delays in procedures and a lack of necessary planning documents. "Political leaders did not build a state security strategy, they did not agree on a political-strategic defense directive," Polko pointed out. Consequently, the army had to independently define the country's defense objectives and submit corresponding equipment requests. "If politicians didn't think, the military had to figure it out," he concluded.

“

Political leaders did not build a state security strategy, they did not agree on a political-strategic defense directive.

According to Polko's analysis, the military was forced into the role of "architects of the security system" because state officials were preoccupied with internal conflicts. He appealed for an urgent improvement in the education and awareness levels among officials. Polko underscored that effective national defense requires seamless and constant cooperation among the highest centers of power, the President, the Prime Minister, and the Minister of National Defense, a collaboration currently hindered by ongoing party disputes.

“

If politicians didn't think, the military had to figure it out.