Police Bill needs stronger oversight: FWCC

The Fiji Women's Crisis Centre (FWCC) is urging for significant amendments to the Fiji Police Bill 2026, arguing that it needs stronger provisions to safeguard human rights and enhance police accountability. The organization specifically points to several clauses that raise alarms regarding police authority.

Miliana Tarai, FWCC Legal Services Manager, highlighted concerns about police access to digital devices, expanded surveillance capabilities, and the conditions under which force can be used. Tarai stated that the bill contains "broad and undefined provisions" that risk inconsistent application and could inadvertently grant police powers beyond what is necessary in a democratic society.

“

The bill continues to contain provisions that raise fundamental human rights and accountability gaps. In particular, the use of broad, vague and undefined terminology in several sections creates a risk of inconsistent interpretation and application and may unintentionally expand police powers beyond what is necessary or proportionate in a democratic society like ours.

Furthermore, the FWCC expressed apprehension about the proposed offense of disaffection. Tarai warned that this provision could deter legitimate criticism of police actions and reform efforts. It creates a potential for journalists, unions, civil society groups, and the public to face accusations of causing disaffection simply for voicing criticism, exposing misconduct, or advocating for police reform.

In response to a proposal allowing Justices of the Peace to issue general search warrants, FWCC Committee Chair Ratu Rakuita Vakalalabure emphasized the need for stronger judicial oversight. The FWCC's recommendations aim to strike a balance between effective law enforcement and the fundamental protection of human rights and public trust.

“

The provision creates a risk that journalists, trade unions, civil society organizations, human rights defenders and members of the public could be accused of causing disaffection merely for criticizing police conduct, policing institution, exposing misconduct or advocating for police reform.