Polish Supreme Court Clarifies Inheritance and Statute of Limitations
Translated from Polish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The Supreme Court of Poland has ruled on whether a request to acquire an inheritance interrupts the statute of limitations for claims.
- The case involved a city that obtained a payment order against a debtor who later died.
- The court decided that filing for inheritance acquisition can interrupt the statute of limitations, but only if it is necessary for pursuing the claim.
The Supreme Court of Poland has delivered a significant ruling clarifying the complex interplay between inheritance law and the statute of limitations for claims. This decision addresses a crucial question: does initiating proceedings to acquire an inheritance effectively pause the clock on a creditor's ability to enforce their claims?
The case at hand involved a municipality that, back in 2015, secured a court order for payment from a debtor. Tragically, the debtor passed away the following year. The situation became complicated a decade later when the city sought to have the earlier payment order enforced. A court registrar dismissed the request, arguing that the claim, subject to a six-year limitation period, had expired at the end of 2024, and that the city's previous applications for inheritance acquisition had not interrupted this period.
the running of the statute of limitations is interrupted by any action before a court or other body appointed to adjudicate or enforce claims.
This legal deadlock prompted the city to appeal, citing Article 123 ยง 1 point 1 of the Civil Code, which states that the statute of limitations is interrupted by any action taken before a court or other authorized body. The core of the dispute then reached the Supreme Court, which had to resolve conflicting interpretations of the law.
In its resolution, the Supreme Court affirmed that filing a request for inheritance acquisition by a creditor *can* indeed interrupt the statute of limitations for their claim against the deceased debtor. However, this interruption is conditional: the action must be demonstrably necessary for the creditor to pursue, establish, satisfy, or secure their claim. This nuanced ruling provides much-needed clarity for creditors navigating the often-treacherous legal landscape of debt recovery involving deceased individuals in Poland, ensuring that diligent efforts to secure one's rights are protected.
the filing by a creditor of a motion for the acquisition of an inheritance after the deceased debtor interrupts the running of the statute of limitations for the creditor's claim, provided that it is necessary for the pursuit, establishment, satisfaction, or security of that claim.
Originally published by Rzeczpospolita in Polish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.