Prosecutors Drop Daejang-dong Bribery Allegations Against Former Supreme Court Justice Cho Jae-yeon
Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- The Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office has decided not to indict former Supreme Court Justice Cho Jae-yeon in connection with the Daejang-dong development scandal.
- Cho was accused of receiving bribes from Kim Man-bae, the majority shareholder of Hwacheon Daeyu, based on a recorded conversation where Kim mentioned a 'certain person' involved in the project.
- Prosecutors cited insufficient evidence as the reason for the non-indictment, while Cho had previously denied any contact with Kim or anyone involved in the scandal.
The Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office has closed the book on the Daejang-dong scandal's entanglement with former Supreme Court Justice Cho Jae-yeon, opting not to indict him due to insufficient evidence. This decision, confirmed on April 20th, follows allegations that Cho was the 'certain person' mentioned in a recorded conversation by Kim Man-bae, the key figure behind Hwacheon Daeyu, who claimed to have given bribes related to the controversial development project.
The Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office has decided not to indict former Supreme Court Justice Cho Jae-yeon in connection with the Daejang-dong development scandal.
The suspicion arose from a 2021 audio recording where Kim Man-bae referred to a 'certain person's' share in the project, with subsequent revelations in early 2022 pointing towards Cho Jae-yeon, who had previously served as the Court Administration Chief. The civic group 'Citizens United for the Rule of Law' had filed a complaint against Cho, which was initially handled by the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials (CIO) before being transferred to the prosecution.
Prosecutors cited insufficient evidence as the reason for the non-indictment.
Cho Jae-yeon has consistently maintained his innocence, vehemently denying any personal or professional dealings with Kim Man-bae or any other individuals implicated in the Daejang-dong case. His strong denials, coupled with the prosecution's inability to find concrete evidence linking him to the alleged bribery, led to the decision to drop the investigation against him.
Cho Jae-yeon had previously denied any contact with Kim Man-bae or anyone involved in the scandal.
From a South Korean perspective, this case highlights the intense scrutiny faced by public officials, even those at the highest judicial levels, when allegations of corruption surface. The media's role in bringing such matters to light, as seen in the reporting by Hankyoreh, is crucial, but so is the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty.' The prosecution's thorough investigation, though ultimately concluding without indictment, reaffirms the importance of due process. The public's expectation for transparency and accountability in major development projects like Daejang-dong remains high, and while this particular allegation against Cho has been dismissed, the broader questions surrounding the scandal persist.
Kim Man-bae said, 'The half of Cheonhwa Dongin No. 1 is not mine, as everyone knows. Half of it belongs to 'that person.'
DistantNews Editorial
Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.
More Stories
From Our Blog
What Gets Lost (and Found) When News Is Translated
The Critical Role of Diaspora Media in Global News
What Travellers Should Know About Countries with Restricted Press
A Digital Nomad's Guide to Following Local News
How the Same Story Looks Different in Different Countries
