Queensland prisoner loses appeal to freeze eggs

A Queensland prisoner has been denied her bid to have her eggs frozen while serving a 10-year sentence for drug trafficking. Rachel Smith's application to Queensland Corrective Services in 2024 for egg extraction and freezing was rejected due to the Corrective Services Act, which prohibits prisoners from accessing assisted reproductive technology.

“

The extraction and freezing of a female's eggs between the age period of 33 and 35 has the potential to reduce the risk of age-related infertility, and to reduce the risk of chromosomal abnormalities and the consequential risks which flow from that condition.

Smith, who was 33 at the time of her initial application, sought to freeze her eggs to mitigate age-related fertility decline. She argued that by the time she completed her sentence, she would be between 39 and 41, increasing the risks of infertility and chromosomal abnormalities for any future child. Medical evidence presented highlighted that fertility significantly reduces after age 39, posing greater risks during pregnancy and for the child.

Her appeal to the Brisbane Supreme Court was dismissed, leading her to take the case to the Court of Appeal. Smith contended that the Supreme Court judge misinterpreted the Corrective Services Act, arguing that egg extraction and freezing are merely preparatory steps, not direct procedures for conception like IVF or artificial insemination. She also invoked the Human Rights Act, asserting her entitlement to health services without discrimination, a stance supported by the Human Rights Commission.

“

so there is equity in who can or can't have such procedures

However, the Court of Appeal in Brisbane unanimously dismissed her appeal. Justices Debra Mullins, Susan Brown, and Thomas Bradley ruled that the definition of assisted reproductive technology is broad and encompasses procedures like oocyte cryopreservation. They stated the Act clearly outlines restrictions to ensure equity and prevent correctional staff from making judgments about prisoners' suitability to procreate while incarcerated.

“

correctional staff aren't required to make "value judgements as to whether individual prisoners should be allowed to procreate while in prison" or are suitable to become parents.