Recession over OPV: Coalition Demands "Urgent" Visit from Lazo, Accuses Government of Political Motives

Uruguay's political landscape is charged as the opposition coalition vehemently demands the "indispensable and urgent" appearance of Defense Minister Sandra Lazo before a special commission. This commission, tasked with scrutinizing the acquisition process of Offshore Patrol Vessels (OPVs), faces mounting pressure following news that Cardama, the contractor, has initiated international arbitration against the Uruguayan State. The coalition argues that the government's handling of the situation, particularly its perceived "tranquility," is detrimental to the country.

“

The indispensable and urgent appearance of the Minister of Defense, Sandra Lazo, before the special commission that was created to investigate and analyze the process of acquiring the OPVs.

Legislators from the coalition, including Pablo Abdala and Gabriel Gianoli, have voiced strong criticism, asserting that the government's decision to terminate the OPV construction was politically motivated, not technically driven. They challenge the narrative that the vessels were merely "badly welded scrap metal," pointing to what they see as a contradiction in the government's stance. "They insist again that this is not a technical issue, when we are tired of hearing that it was badly welded scrap metal that sank," stated Gianoli, highlighting the perceived inconsistency in the government's public statements.

“

We signed a strategic agreement with the Honduran Architects' College to transform our capital with a technical and sustainable vision. The support of architects is fundamental to promoting the urban planning and development that the city needs.

Furthermore, the opposition questions Minister Lazo's continued absence from the commission's proceedings, especially given its six-month mandate. They suggest her party's reluctance to have her appear is a factor. Felipe Schipani, a legislator from the Colorado Party, pointed out a "flagrant contradiction," noting that technical aspects of the OPVs, once deemed crucial, now seem irrelevant following the contract's rescission. The coalition also highlights another apparent inconsistency: the government's recent assertion that international arbitration is not the ideal route, despite a February resolution signed by President Yamandú Orsi authorizing the Ministry of Defense to initiate penal, administrative, and arbitral actions.

“

They insist again that this is not a technical issue, when we are tired of hearing that it was badly welded scrap metal that sank.

Gerardo Sotelo, another coalition member, lamented the decision to terminate the contract as potentially "one of the worst" outcomes, suggesting that the government has "spent money unnecessarily" thus far. The opposition's stance underscores a deep distrust in the government's handling of the OPV affair, framing it as a politically driven decision with significant financial implications for Uruguay. The call for Minister Lazo's testimony is central to their efforts to uncover the full truth behind the contract termination and its aftermath.

“

Minister Lazo has not yet appeared before the commission when they have already been working for two months and the period of action will be six months.