Romanian company debts can fall on entrepreneurs years later

Romanian tax authorities possess the power to pursue company debts directly from administrators and shareholders, even years after a business has ceased operations or been declared insolvent. This mechanism, outlined in the Fiscal Procedure Code, allows the National Agency for Fiscal Administration (ANAF) to recover outstanding sums from individuals who contributed to the company's failure to meet its budgetary obligations.

“

In certain conditions, ANAF can come after years directly to administrators or associates for the recovery of outstanding amounts, and Romanian courts do not even agree on the deadline within which this is still legally possible.

The law permits ANAF to pursue this "joint and several liability" when it determines that company leaders acted with bad faith or were complicit in making the debts unrecoverable. Common scenarios include the disposal or concealment of company assets, failure to initiate insolvency proceedings, intentionally causing non-payment of taxes, or obtaining undue refunds from the state budget.

“

The law provides that joint and several liability can be invoked when the fiscal authority finds that the persons in the company's management acted in bad faith or contributed to the impossibility of recovering the claims.

For many entrepreneurs, the reality of this personal liability only surfaces when ANAF initiates enforcement actions, sometimes long after the company's activities have ended. Lawyer Luisiana Dobrinescu emphasizes that simply closing a company does not erase its tax obligations. Administrators and shareholders may face bank account seizures or personal property liens based on ANAF's decisions to enforce joint liability.

“

The simple cessation of a company's activity does not mean the extinction of tax obligations.

Even transferring shares or the age of the debt does not automatically shield individuals from recovery efforts if the legal conditions for liability are met. A significant point of contention in Romanian courts is the timeframe within which ANAF can pursue these debts. While tax authorities typically cite a five-year period from the declaration of insolvency, some judicial panels argue for a shorter, three-year statute of limitations based on general civil law principles, creating legal uncertainty for business owners.

“

The difference in interpretation is essential, as it can lead to either...