RSP fails first hurdle as organised political party

The Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP), which rose to prominence promising an alternative political culture in Nepal, has faced significant criticism from its own delegates during its first general convention. The event, intended to set an example for other parties, instead echoed the procedural shortcomings of established political groups. From the outset, the RSP's shortcomings were apparent. The convention's initial stages were marred by delays in finalizing representatives, a fundamental step for any party gathering. Ironically, the party's political and economic papers, which outline its platform for the next four years, were endorsed before this crucial representative finalization. These documents propose significant shifts, including transforming the National Assembly into a non-partisan chamber and backing a directly elected executive head and a fully proportional electoral system. These substantial proposals, which could reshape Nepali politics, were presented and endorsed without open debate. Party president Rabi Lamichhane read the documents, and delegates were asked to approve them, effectively turning the convention into a rubber stamp. This process, criticized by some as lasting only "seven seconds" for deliberation, contrasts sharply with the RSP's stated commitment to transparency and robust discussion. The convention's organizational chaos extended to the election of its leadership. Originally scheduled to conclude on Tuesday, the event has already been extended by two days, with its final conclusion uncertain. This mismanagement, coupled with the rushed endorsement of policy documents, has led to widespread delegate frustration and raised questions about the RSP's internal democracy and its ability to enact the change it promised.

“

The way the political and economic dossiers were endorsed is not without questions.