RSP’s push for a directly elected executive and fully proportional representation sparks political debate

The Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) has formally proposed a significant overhaul of Nepal's governance structure, advocating for a directly elected executive and a fully proportional electoral system. This move, made during the party's first general convention, has reignited critical debates surrounding potential constitutional amendments. Historically, the concept of a directly elected executive was a point of contention during Nepal's Constituent Assembly deliberations. While the current constitution establishes a parliamentary system for selecting the prime minister, the RSP, led by chairman Rabi Lamichhane, argues for a model that ensures stable leadership and clear responsibilities. "We are in favour of a directly elected executive with a stable leadership and clear responsibilities," Lamichhane stated in his political report. Alongside the governance model, the RSP champions a fully proportional electoral system, aiming to enhance the representation of all communities. This proposal echoes similar ideas previously put forth by other political factions. However, major parties like the Nepali Congress and the CPN-UML have historically favored the existing parliamentary system, albeit with potential improvements. The RSP's formal introduction of these issues is expected to intensify the national discourse on constitutional reform. Furthermore, the RSP has proposed transforming the National Assembly into a non-partisan body composed of experts, chaired by the country's Vice President. While the RSP holds a strong presence in the House of Representatives, it currently lacks representation in the National Assembly. The party anticipates gaining seats in the National Assembly following upcoming local elections. The RSP's proposals, particularly the push for a directly elected executive and proportional representation, are poised to significantly influence ongoing discussions about Nepal's political trajectory and constitutional future.

“

We have held distinct views on the constitution since the party’s inception. We are in favour of a directly elected executive with a stable leadership and clear responsibilities.