Ruling, Opposition Parties Clash Over Real Estate Policy

South Korea's ruling and opposition parties engaged in a heated debate over President Lee Jae-myung's real estate policies. The People Power Party (PPP) accused the government of exacerbating rental market instability through strengthened taxation on non-resident homeowners. PPP spokesperson Park Seong-hoon argued that forcing non-resident homeowners to sell or occupy their properties could shift the burden to tenants, akin to 'pouring fuel on the fire' of rising rents. He criticized the government's approach as a 'textbook of policy failure,' suggesting a focus on supply expansion and market normalization, rather than taxes and regulations, should have been prioritized, drawing parallels to past policy missteps. Park further characterized the administration as lacking the ability to create sound policies, verify them, or take responsibility for failures, labeling it a 'three-no administration' that ignores public voices and imposes hardship. The party demanded an immediate withdrawal of what they called 'hasty and punitive tax policies' that hold citizens' property and housing hostage.

“

The tax reform plan's real estate measures also carry a significant risk of increasing housing instability for the working class.

In response, the Democratic Party (DP) accused the PPP of obstructing necessary housing supply legislation. DP spokesperson Jeon Soo-mi questioned who was truly preventing the supply of housing that the public desires, pointing out that the PPP was withholding key bills that would support the government's supply measures. She described the opposition's actions as 'deceiving the public' by using legislative power to hinder housing supply and delay redevelopment projects, then blaming the government. Jeon dismissed the PPP's concerns about the tax reforms burdening ordinary citizens as 'speculation born of ignorance.' She stated that the government's tax adjustments on non-resident, high-value homes were measures to realize tax justice by correcting excessive tax breaks previously concentrated on ultra-high-value, non-resident, and multi-home owners. The DP urged the PPP to cease ' 소모적인 논쟁' (consumptive debates) and return to the National Assembly to actively cooperate on urgent housing supply legislation and institutional improvements.

“

If the burden of increased taxation on non-resident homeowners leads to more sales or a shift to owner-occupation, that burden could ultimately fall on tenants.