Samaras's attacks on New Democracy seen as personal vendetta, not political strategy

Former Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras continues his relentless criticism of the ruling New Democracy party, but his attacks appear to stem more from personal animosity than distinct political disagreements. While Samaras raises issues concerning foreign policy and wiretapping, which others also address, the unfiltered intensity of his opposition is striking.

His approach leaves an impression that his disputes with his former party and its leadership are not fundamentally political. In a political climate where even post-political figures are trying to present concrete plans, Samaras has reverted to a style of anti-Mitsotakis sentiment that even staunch opponents have largely abandoned as electorally unproductive.

Samaras has even targeted Dora Bakoyannis, remarking on her past leadership loss to him 17 years ago. This behavior, characterized by a "swaggering tone" and "great pride," highlights a perceived inability to move on. The article suggests he is deliberately delaying the formation of his own political party to coincide with elections, aiming to inflict maximum damage on New Democracy by maintaining the momentum of a new political force.

The article posits that New Democracy is inadvertently falling into a trap by engaging with Samaras. By responding to his criticisms, the party grants him a platform, credibility, and publicity that he might otherwise lack. His weekly attacks, it is argued, would lose their impact without the certainty of a counter-response, and he wouldn't receive such focused attention if he weren't perceived as a significant opponent by more popular figures within the party.

“

You know how many years have passed since she lost the leadership to me? 17. She still hasn't recovered!