DistantNews
Support us

São Paulo court orders removal of posts by Tarcísio and Nunes governments during election period

From Folha de S.Paulo · () Portuguese

Translated from Portuguese and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

Newswire Named sources In the courts
  • The São Paulo Regional Electoral Court issued a preliminary order requiring the state government and city hall to remove posts about official works and services within 24 hours.
  • The case followed a request from Fernando Haddad's campaign, which alleged improper use of public resources during the restricted election period.
  • The judge imposed a daily fine of 10,000 reais for noncompliance but did not rule on alleged political abuse or misuse of media.

A São Paulo electoral judge ordered the state government and the city administration to take down social media posts showing public deliveries during the election advertising blackout. The preliminary ruling gives officials 24 hours to remove the material or face a daily fine of 10,000 reais.

Fernando Haddad's Workers' Party campaign brought the complaint against São Paulo Governor Tarcísio de Freitas and Mayor Ricardo Nunes. It cited posts on Agência SP and government social media accounts covering projects and services, including the delivery of Praça do Triunfo, Residencial Ipê and Metro Line 17-Gold.

Judge Domitila Manssur said keeping institutional advertising online during the legally prohibited period justified removing the content. She also said the danger of harm was present, supporting an immediate measure.

The danger of harm is likewise present.

— Domitila ManssurThe judge cited the risk of harm in granting the preliminary order to remove the posts.

The judge drew a distinction between government operations and campaign publicity. She said the election calendar does not halt state administration, and that the executive may inspect works, monitor services and deliver equipment as part of regular government duties. Her ruling therefore did not decide whether the posts amounted to political abuse or an improper use of communication channels.

Manssur described the removal order as appropriate and reversible. She said it would not prevent administrative activities from continuing or block the publication of information that the law allows officials to make public.

The removal measure is also appropriate and reversible, without preventing the continuation of administrative activities or the publication of information whose disclosure is legally permitted.

— Domitila ManssurThe judge explained why the order would not stop routine government operations or lawful public information.
About this summary

Originally published by Folha de S.Paulo in Portuguese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.