DistantNews
Support us

SEEP calls for transparency in Fiji’s constitutional review

From FBC News · () English

Translated from English and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Named sources New plan
  • Fiji’s Social Empowerment Education Programme called for greater transparency and public participation in the constitutional review process.
  • Executive Director Chantelle Khan said young people, women, people with disabilities, workers, businesses and community groups should have opportunities to contribute.
  • The Constitutional Review Commission submitted its report and draft amendment bill to President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu on Aug. 31.

Fiji’s constitutional review should not proceed without clearer information for ordinary citizens, the Social Empowerment Education Programme says. The organization is calling for greater transparency and public participation before Fijians engage with the proposed changes.

SEEP Executive Director Chantelle Khan said people need access to the Constitutional Review Commission’s report and its proposed amendments. Without that information, she said, they cannot participate meaningfully in the debate over Fiji’s constitutional future.

Khan said the process should include young people, women, people with disabilities, workers, businesses and community groups. She argued that greater openness would build public trust, limit misinformation and support informed discussion.

The Constitutional Review Commission submitted its report and Draft Constitution Amendment Bill to President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu on Aug. 31.

Ordinary Fijians need clear information about the Constitutional Review Commission’s report and proposed amendments before they can meaningfully engage.

— Chantelle KhanShe called for public access to the review documents.
About this summary

Originally published by FBC News in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.