Senate committee votes to hold Dr. Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress

A Senate committee voted along party lines to hold Dr. Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress, a week after the former top health official refused to answer questions during a hearing on the COVID-19 pandemic.

Committee chair Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., stated that holding a witness in contempt is a serious matter that should be rare. He announced plans to refer the contempt decision to the Justice Department for potential prosecution.

“

Holding a witness in contempt is a serious thing, and it should be rare.

Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment, which protects against self-incrimination, more than 100 times during the July 29 hearing. He cited comments made by Sen. Paul, who chairs the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, about wanting to incarcerate him. The hearing aimed to question Fauci, a key figure in the nation's pandemic response, about the origins of the novel coronavirus.

“

The only conclusion I can reach is that the sole reason he is calling me before this committee is to get me to say something, anything, that could vindicate his repeated public pledges that I end up, in his words 'behind bars.'

Republicans on the committee argued that Fauci did not have the right to invoke the Fifth Amendment, referencing a preemptive pardon issued by former President Joe Biden. However, Democrats, who characterized the hearing as politically motivated, defended Fauci's decision. Sen. Gary Peters, D-Mich., the committee's ranking member, criticized Paul's decision to hold Fauci in contempt, arguing it could deter future witnesses from asserting their constitutional rights.

Fauci, in his opening statement, described Paul's actions as an "obsession" with calling for his prosecution. He stated that the sole reason for being called before the committee appeared to be to elicit a statement that would vindicate Paul's public pledges to see him "behind bars."

“

If this committee now seeks to punish a witness for asserting their constitutional protected Fifth Amendment rights, future witnesses will argue that appearing before Congress exposes them to punishment regardless of whether they comply with the subpoena and invoke a constitutional protection.