DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel /Conflict & Security

Senior Lebanese insists US-brokered deal with Israel 'won't be implemented,' warns of divisions

From Jerusalem Post · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources New plan
  • Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri has criticized a US-brokered agreement between Lebanon and Israel, warning it could incite internal divisions and stating it will not be implemented.
  • Berri, an ally of Hezbollah, described the deal as "dictates" and suggested that Iran-US negotiations offer the only realistic path to Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon.
  • The agreement, which foresees the Lebanese military taking control of territory pending Hezbollah's disarmament, has been rejected by Hezbollah as a surrender.

Lebanon's Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, a key ally of Hezbollah, has strongly condemned a US-brokered agreement between Lebanon and Israel, warning that it could lead to internal strife and asserting that the deal will not be implemented.

The agreement "won't be implemented."

โ€” Nabih BerriStating his view on the viability of the US-brokered agreement between Lebanon and Israel.

In comments to Lebanon's al-Akhbar newspaper, Berri characterized the agreement as "dictates." He argued that Iran-US negotiations represent the sole realistic opportunity for securing Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon. Berri cautioned that any attempt to separate Lebanon from the US-Iran diplomatic track would only prolong the Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon.

The agreement, signed by Lebanese and Israeli ambassadors in Washington on Friday, outlines a process where the Lebanese military would assume control of territory in "pilot zones" contingent upon the verified disarmament of non-state groups, a clear reference to Hezbollah. This provision is intended to enable the progressive redeployment of Israeli forces.

The most dangerous aspect of the agreement was not only its political content, but "the potential for it to incite internal divisions and draw the Lebanese into a confrontation among themselves."

โ€” Nabih BerriExplaining his concerns about the US-brokered agreement's impact on Lebanese society.

However, Hezbollah has vehemently rejected the deal, deeming it a surrender to Israel and demanding that Beirut cease direct talks with the Israeli government. Berri echoed these sentiments, highlighting the "potential for it to incite internal divisions and draw the Lebanese into a confrontation among themselves" as the agreement's most dangerous aspect. The Lebanese administration, led by President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, had initially called for direct talks with Israel, despite strong objections from Hezbollah.

Hezbollah, which has demanded Beirut quit its face-to-face talks with the Israeli government, has rejected the deal as a surrender to Israel.

โ€” ReutersDescribing Hezbollah's official stance on the US-brokered agreement.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.